On Monday 28 October 2024 09:14:43 Pacific Standard Time Thiago Macieira wrote: > Of course. > > But you understood my general goals and, so long as I keep to them as Volker > is requesting, neither you nor anyone else had a problem.
Update: Re: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-131575 even before I made any changes (and I'm not sure I would have enough time), looks like Microsoft beat us to the punch: you CANNOT mix C++17 and C++20 in a static build of Qt with MSVC. You must choose a single option for ALL your code. This changes the premise I made: that users didn't have a business choosing the C++ version. That being the case, I'm just not going to do anything. Not my problem any more to move us forward. That also means I will not be doing the work to test our headers in C++23 mode either - that's SEP again. My concerns regarding ABI remain and will continue to block anything that would offer C++20 content to users that expands to too-much inline code (std::format, for now). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
