On Monday 28 October 2024 00:59:25 Pacific Daylight Time Vladimir Minenko via Development wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > I would not take the silence as a sign of consent. I rather have the > impression that there is no sufficient interest in this at the moment. > Despite this, there are quite a few urgent improvements required on the CI. > I greatly doubt it will be possible to have additional configurations for > any of the permutations of conditions you might need.
Lazy consensus is part of our governance. If no one speaks up with arguments against, it implies no one has arguments against of sufficient interest to them to voice in the first place. Lack of interest and apathy imply people don't care enough one way or the other. I am not asking for additional configurations in the CI. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
