Am 21.02.2024 um 17:36 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 08:26:52 PST Jøger Hansegård via Development
wrote:
Our Qt coding conventions (https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) has a
statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as I
understand, this statement is now outdated. Can we delete this statement
and lean on Cpp Core Guidelines Cpp Core Guidelines SF.22 instead
https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rs-unnamed2?
Or do we need a Qt specific guideline on this topic?
There doesn't seem to be a semantic difference. Are you proposing we simply
replace our wording to point to SF22 or am I missing something?
How that?
https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions#Things_to_avoid says:
"Avoid the use of anonymous namespaces in favor of the static keyword if
possible."
While
https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rs-unnamed2
says:
"Consider putting every definition in an implementation source file in
an unnamed namespace [...]"
Either I am missunderstanding something, or Qt Coding Conventions and
C++ Core Guidelines strongly disagree on whether to use anonymous
namespaces.
Ciao
Mathias
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
