> Our Qt coding conventions (https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) has a > statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as I > understand, this statement is now outdated. Can we delete this statement > and lean on Cpp Core Guidelines Cpp Core Guidelines SF.22 instead? > Or do we need a Qt specific guideline on this topic?
There doesn't seem to be a semantic difference. Are you proposing we simply replace our wording to point to SF22 or am I missing something? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering https://wiki.qt.io/Things_To_Look_Out_For_In_Reviews references several guidelines (Canons), including Qt coding conventions and also Cpp Core Guidelines. My idea was to avoid redundancy, and unless Qt coding conventions specifies otherwise, we lean on the other guidelines. So my proposal is to delete the item on anonymous namespaces from the Qt coding conventions. -- Jøger Hansegård -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
