> Our Qt coding conventions (https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) has a
> statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as I
> understand, this statement is now outdated. Can we delete this statement
> and lean on Cpp Core Guidelines Cpp Core Guidelines SF.22 instead?
> Or do we need a Qt specific guideline on this topic?

There doesn't seem to be a semantic difference. Are you proposing we simply
replace our wording to point to SF22 or am I missing something?

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering


https://wiki.qt.io/Things_To_Look_Out_For_In_Reviews references several 
guidelines (Canons), including Qt coding conventions and also Cpp Core 
Guidelines. My idea was to avoid redundancy, and unless Qt coding conventions 
specifies otherwise, we lean on the other guidelines. So my proposal is to 
delete the item on anonymous namespaces from the Qt coding conventions.

--
Jøger Hansegård
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to