On Monday, 21 February 2022 23:03:52 PST Marc Mutz wrote: > Can we have a decision here? The windows for 6.2.4 as well as 6.3 are > closing. After considering multiple solutions, I'm favouring a clean > solution as per https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtwayland/+/395784 > (will require massaging, as we don't have QT_REMOVED_SINCE in Qt < 6.3). If > people want to experiment with differing C++20 and C++17 APIs when we don't > even have C++20 on the CI, yet, they may be my guests. I already sunk more > than enough time into this. > > It's a brown paper bag. We can blame Clang in the ChangeLog. Let's suck it > up and move on.
My opinion is unchanged: don't do it for 6.2.4. After 6.2.4, the 6.2 branch becomes irrelevant for me, so I don't care what you do. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
