On Thursday, 17 February 2022 02:53:11 PST Marc Mutz wrote: > 2. that brings up back to The Other Discussion™, about C++20 types in the > ABI, which isn't really about C++20 types, after all, but about symbols > only C++20 code would need/could use > > I'm not sure where we left off on (2), but it's unlikely that anything we > decide will be retroactively applied to Qt 6.2, isn't it?
I don't have a problem about using any type in our ABI, so long as it's ALWAYS there and that no one who performed an acceptable upgrade would find a linker issue. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
