1) Clang cannot compile all Qt-using codebases. Therefore, its tooling cannot
work in all cases either.
That's true, but on the other hand, covering at least a half of code bases 
would be a huge progress. I don't have representative statistics, but I guess 
that the real percentage will be larger.

2) No one has volunteered to write such conversion scripts
Well, it could be a problem if there were no more or less commercially 
successful companies behind the Qt. There is a business value in such a tool. 
Of course providing porting as a service might bring more money, but it cannot 
be fully automated anyway.

And a minor (3) is that automatic conversions seldom look nice and will
require manual retouching anyway.
Yes, sure. As I said before, it should be OK to automatically convert only the 
most straightforward cases and mark others. Even marking is already a very 
helpful thing.


Vitaly

________________________________
From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Thiago 
Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 15:55
To: development@qt-project.org <development@qt-project.org>
Subject: [Development] Clang-based refactoring to Qt 6 (Proposal: Deprecate 
QVector in Qt 6)

On Thursday, 23 April 2020 05:25:33 PDT Vitaly Fanaskov wrote:
> Provide clang-based tools to (semi-)automatically port users' code bases to
> a new version of Qt. These tools might either fix a code or at least add a
> comment in potentially problematic places where a user should correct the
> code. A developer who changes API should also implement a rule for these
> tools.

This was discussed in a QtCS two or three years ago. There are two huge
problems with that:

1) Clang cannot compile all Qt-using codebases. Therefore, its tooling cannot
work in all cases either.

2) No one has volunteered to write such conversion scripts.

And a minor (3) is that automatic conversions seldom look nice and will
require manual retouching anyway.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel System Software Products



_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to