On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:43:33AM +0000, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Hi, > > In dev we've had QVector being an alias for QList for a while now. For > the 6.0 release this particular topic (QList/QVector) suggests two > goals (among others): > > (1) Use the same type throughout the public API of Qt. > > (2) Make it easy for our users to maintain a code base that works > with Qt 5 and 6. > > In the light of those two goals, I think we should keep using QList as > the type in the public API. I don't think we should do a search and > replace activity and switch to QVector. In the light of that, I would > like to propose simply deprecating QVector and stick to QList > everywhere. > > What do you think?
This would avoid *quite* a bit code churn for user code. +1 Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
