On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:17:38PM +0200, Daniel Engelke wrote: > > You'd need also adapt some variable and function names, > > comments and documentation are silently broken. > > I don't really see it, unless you name all variables like qListMyList. > > As for comments it's not like the logical meaning changes. Besides, > QList will have QVectors implementation anyway, > > making comments or variable names that focus on it being a list > illogical anyhow. (Besides QList was never a list to begin with) > > Either way you'll have the same issues with API that is using QVector. > > That would need to be changed to QList to be consistent.
In other parts of the discussion the point was made that such a renaming is trivial, and it stands to reason that there's quite a bit more code using QList in the wild than QVector. So overall eco-system-effort to convert to QVector is higher than staying with QList. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
