El dijous, 23 d’abril de 2020, a les 9:43:33 CEST, Simon Hausmann va escriure: > Hi, > > In dev we've had QVector being an alias for QList for a while now. For the > 6.0 release this particular topic (QList/QVector) suggests two goals (among > others): > > (1) Use the same type throughout the public API of Qt. > > (2) Make it easy for our users to maintain a code base that works with > Qt 5 and 6. > > > In the light of those two goals, I think we should keep using QList as the > type in the public API. I don't think we should do a search and replace > activity and switch to QVector. In the light of that, I would like to > propose simply deprecating QVector and stick to QList everywhere. > > > What do you think?
As taught in Computer Science/Engineering courses: * QList is not a list * QVector is a vector Compating to std:: types: * QList is not comparable to a std::list * QVector is comparable to a std::vector Personally i think it makes sense to keep the QVector name. Cheers, Albert > > > Simon -- Albert Astals Cid | albert.astals....@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
