06.09.2019, 20:28, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On Friday, 6 September 2019 09:04:09 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > wrote: >> I was actually proposing option A, to avoid clashes. The Qt:: namespace >> at the moment is simply too big to reasonably claim that there will be >> no conflicts. A few examples that come into mind: Qt::horizontal, >> Qt::vertical, Qt::[color name], Qt::SHIFT, Qt::Monday, Qt::XAxis. >> >> Option C does not work, a namespace is either entirely inline or it's not. > > Option D: the inline namespace gets another name, something different from > "Qt". > > Suggestion: Qt6
+1 I think this is the only sensible choice -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
