> On 6 Sep 2019, at 14:10, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > <development@qt-project.org> wrote: > > Il 06/09/19 11:26, Mutz, Marc via Development ha scritto: >> The change is SC, and makes namespaced and non-namespaced builds behave >> the same. > > Small question: the claim here is that the change is SC; however below it's > pointed out that there may be slight differences in name lookup (in some > super-corner cases, I concede). That would make it non-SC. Which one is it? > :-) > > (Disclaimer: I would agree with the change, cf. the Qt::endl discussion with > gerrit).
Wouldn’t that pull all the enum value in the current Qt namespace into the users namespace? Things like Qt::AlignLeft? I can’t see how moving from requiring the Qt prefix there to not requiring it anymore is an improvement. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
