On Tuesday, 18 June 2019 13:56:36 PDT Alberto Mardegan wrote: > Well... Expecting the data to detach on an `if (d)` check seems worth > incurring into a breakage > But I certainly cannot exclude that there is some code out there which > happens to work exactly because of this implicit detach, so it might be > better not touch this, after all.
You're then describing buggy code that just happens to work today. I'd say this is worth breaking and finding out about. This kind of fix is something we'd do even in patch releases. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
