On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 13:41:31 PDT Mutz, Marc via Development wrote: > That QThread is-a QObject has caused problems in the past. How to use > QThread correctly has been the source of much discussion (e.g. > https://blog.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/), and any > thread can have an event loop via QEventLoop. But, yes, QThread probably > needs to stay around longer. That shouldn't mean it does so forever. I > think std::thread is much easier to use and understand, and with > QEventLoop supporting it already, I don't feel much attachment to > QThread anymore.
Unti std::thread can emit signals, no, it's not a sufficient solution. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
