On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 10:10:36AM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Sonntag, 9. Juni 2019 00:09:30 CEST Kevin Kofler wrote: > > QtAlgorithms should just be undeprecated. I don't care whether std::sort is > > faster. If the version of Qt I tested with was fast enough, then I'm > > perfectly fine with newer versions not being faster, no matter how fast some > > incompatible implementation elsewhere is (and I don't care whether it > > happens to ship with my compiler or not). > > If you are happy why would you upgrade Qt? If you don't upgrade Qt your code > will keep working..
At on Linux systems application developers kind of depend on the distribution's choice of system Qt. So effectively, application developers need to support multiple versions of Qt as they cannot really be sure which of their version the distributors will combine with which version of Qt which is conveniently ignored by our deprecators when they deprecated things without offering a reasonably usable alternative. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
