I was under the same impression, +1 from me too of course. Regards, Volker
On Monday, 18 March 2019 12:23:29 CET Lars Knoll wrote: > Obvious +1, I thought he had those rights already since a long time. > > Cheers, > Lars > > On 18 Mar 2019, at 10:07, Simon Hausmann > <simon.hausm...@qt.io<mailto:simon.hausm...@qt.io>> wrote: > > > +1 to the slam dunk of making Brett approver :). He's great to work with, > always positive and I certainly trust him on the approval process. > > > Simon > ________________________________ > From: Development > <development-boun...@qt-project.org<mailto:development-bounces@qt-project.o > rg>> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen > <ville.voutilai...@qt.io<mailto:ville.voutilai...@qt.io>> Sent: Monday, > March 18, 2019 9:05 > To: development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> > Subject: [Development] Nominating Brett Stottlemeyer for Approver status > > Brett is the maintainer of Qt Remote Objects. Thus he should be > documented as a maintainer, and should also be an approver. Brett has > been effectively maintaining QRO since 2014, so it seems like a slam > dunk to give him the rights. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Director of Engineering KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
