Obvious +1, I thought he had those rights already since a long time. Cheers, Lars
On 18 Mar 2019, at 10:07, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@qt.io<mailto:simon.hausm...@qt.io>> wrote: +1 to the slam dunk of making Brett approver :). He's great to work with, always positive and I certainly trust him on the approval process. Simon ________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org<mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org>> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@qt.io<mailto:ville.voutilai...@qt.io>> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:05 To: development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: [Development] Nominating Brett Stottlemeyer for Approver status Brett is the maintainer of Qt Remote Objects. Thus he should be documented as a maintainer, and should also be an approver. Brett has been effectively maintaining QRO since 2014, so it seems like a slam dunk to give him the rights. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
