On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:06:17 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:54, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote: > > > > Ok, guess I misunderstood a bit. My idea was to keep ‘dev’ for 5.x > > development and ‘qt6’ for Qt 6 related development. At some point (when > > 5.15 is branched) we’d basically rename qt6 to dev (because at that point > > there’s no 5.x anymore). > > Okey, so we _will_ have parallel Qt 5 and Qt 6 feature development, and in > that case need two “dev” branches. > I argue that instead of naming them ‘dev’ and ‘qt6’ like proposed, we use > explicit names, either: > - 6.0 and 5.15 (if there’s no 6.1 branched 6.0 is “dev. If there’s no 5.16 > branched, 5.15 is “dev”) I prefer the idea of keeping dev and make it head of 5.x that very clearly indicates we want new feature development in 5.x not in qt6.
'Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
