> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:17, Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.ves...@qt.io> wrote: > > >> On 15 Jan 2019, at 09:24, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote: >> >> Can the Gerrit/CI folks please create that branch? > > Going forward we will now have “dev” development in both Qt 5 and Qt 6. > > Can we please use explicit version names instead of arbitrary named “dev” and > “qt6” branches? > > dev ==> 5.13 -> 5.14, etc > qt6 ==> 6.0 -> 6.1
So the idea would be to always branch the next feature branch away? Probably quite a change in names, and it would still mean that we have two branches where feature development happens. > > A branch enters stability phase once the next upcoming minor branch has been > branched off from it. > > Or, if we must keep a “generic” master branch perhaps they can be: > > dev ==> 5.x > qt6 ==> 6.x This one was actually my proposal ;-) Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
