Hi, Yes, "hard to work with" :).
Cheers, BogDan. În ziua de joi, 1 noiembrie 2018, la 11:24:29 EET, Vlad Stelmahovsky a scris: > you mean "hard to work with"? > > On 11/1/18 9:34 AM, Bogdan Vatra via Development wrote: > > Hi, > > > > GN is the closest build system to QBS, the only problem it has it's > > > > controled by Google and these guys are sometime had to work with. > > > > Cheers, > > BogDan. > > > > În ziua de joi, 1 noiembrie 2018, la 10:30:01 EET, Nikolai Kosjar a scris: > >> On 10/29/18 1:17 PM, Lars Knoll wrote: > >>> Given that we are confident we can build Qt 6 with cmake, I believe that > >>> it makes most sense to follow down that route. > >> > >> Just some observation: > >> > >> LLVM/Clang is a bigger project using CMake for some longer time and > >> coincidentally, just now, there is a discussion whether they should add > >> GN build files to their repositories as, let me quote: > >> > >> """ > >> cmake is great for many use cases, but in my opinion local day-to-day > >> development isn't one of them. > >> """ > >> > >> Clang: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-October/060006.html > >> LLVM: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127342.html > >> > >> Nikolai > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Development mailing list > >> Development@qt-project.org > >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
