>From the same email perhaps it's also worth quoting the first paragraph:
" first things first: If you're happy with cmake, you can stop reading now. Nobody is proposing that LLVM moves off cmake, and nobody is proposing anything that's causing people using cmake more work. " Simon ________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+simon.hausmann=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kos...@qt.io> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 9:30:01 AM To: Lars Knoll; Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6 On 10/29/18 1:17 PM, Lars Knoll wrote: > Given that we are confident we can build Qt 6 with cmake, I believe that it > makes most sense to follow down that route. Just some observation: LLVM/Clang is a bigger project using CMake for some longer time and coincidentally, just now, there is a discussion whether they should add GN build files to their repositories as, let me quote: """ cmake is great for many use cases, but in my opinion local day-to-day development isn't one of them. """ Clang: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-October/060006.html LLVM: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127342.html Nikolai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
