On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM Cristian Adam <cristian.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:24 Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 05:00, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > - Any track record that Qbs was not fit for the job? (Please no "we >> > > can't build Qt with it", as you cannot build Qt with anything but >> > > qmake right now) >> > >> > No, of course one could have made it support building Qt. There were >> some missing items like the configuration system and some other things, all >> of those could of course have been implemented. >> >> How CMake will solve the 'configuration' problem. Will CMake allow us >> to build for, say, QNX, GreenHill, VxWorks, and the likes? I doubt! >> Everyone is bragging about open source (me first), but the Qt market >> is medical, automotive and avionics/space industry, isn't it? How will >> CMake cope with that? >> CMake is not even aware that they are other OS behind WIndows and >> Linux Desktop.... >> > > CMake is used in Automotive. > > Here is a link to the blog of one of the QNX's Eclipse CDT contributors, > and there you can see how hard it is to write a CMake toolchain file for > QNX: https://cdtdoug.ca/2017/10/06/qnx-cmake-toolchain-file.html > > Cheers, > Cristian. > And here is the link with the nightly builds that run on the CMake code base: https://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=CMake&date=2018-10-29#!/%23Nightly_Expected There are quite some platform combinations there. QNX is not there because of licensing I suppose. Cheers, Cristian.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development