> > On 30 Oct 2018, at 05:00, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > - Any track record that Qbs was not fit for the job? (Please no "we > > can't build Qt with it", as you cannot build Qt with anything but > > qmake right now) > > No, of course one could have made it support building Qt. There were some > missing items like the configuration system and some other things, all of > those could of course have been implemented.
How CMake will solve the 'configuration' problem. Will CMake allow us to build for, say, QNX, GreenHill, VxWorks, and the likes? I doubt! Everyone is bragging about open source (me first), but the Qt market is medical, automotive and avionics/space industry, isn't it? How will CMake cope with that? CMake is not even aware that they are other OS behind WIndows and Linux Desktop.... Just Sayin'. Chris _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
