On Friday, 26 October 2018 01:12:35 PDT Andy Nichols wrote: > The details of this are tricky though because it depends a lot on trust > (similarly the security list). Much of the concern with this proposal has > to do with the potential for abuse, and rightly so. I'm not super happy > with the idea of a Conduct Cabal who has to the power to banish people from > the community either.
One idea I've seen recently is to populate the panel members at random, on a need basis, much like jury duty. I don't know of project adopting this solution and whether they've been successful at it. Would be nice to research. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
