On 10/26/18 9:05 AM, Oliver Wolff wrote: > +1 from here as well. I also think that the proposed document (and > especially the "enforcement" part) is way too long
The KDE CoC [1] does not specify any action to be taken when it's violated. That's the main reason why it seems shorter. If you only consider the equivalent sections in our proposed CoC, the KDE one is actually much longer. That said, I wouldn't mind replacing the "Our Pledge" and "Our Standards" paragraphs in the current proposal with the KDE CoC if that helps with acceptance here. But, how does this actually work in practice at KDE? Is there another document that states what they do if someone oversteps the boundaries? There isn't even a contact email in their CoC. So, if someone was slapping me around with a large fish in the KDE IRC channel, I still wouldn't know what to do about it. Ulf [1] https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
