+1 this. I have no problems with the KDE CoC.
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 1:39 PM > From: "André Pönitz" <apoen...@t-online.de> > To: "Volker Krause" <volker.kra...@kdab.com> > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Volker Krause via Development wrote: > > We do have a Code of Conduct at KDE for about 10 years now, and this hasn't > > led to abuse of power, suppression of free speech, racism against white > > people > > or whatever other nonsense people seem to attribute to CoCs nowadays. > > The KDE CoC is *friendly*. It contains words like "considerate", "pragmatic", > "support". It doesn't push someone's personal political agenda. This is a > completely different beast than the Contributor Covenant that's about > "enforcing", "reporting", "banning". > > I think we'd see much less heat in the discussion if the proposed Qt CoC had > been based on the KDE CoC. > > Andre' > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
