I would also like to point out an extreme case: https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 Now, I am not saying the Code is going to transform into a shitstorm like this. But it's something to be aware of. Some clear boundaries must be set if Code is ever enforced.
Also: a question needs to be answered: say, there's a contributor that does a lot. He's a rude ass, but he is a _productive_ rude ass and mostly everyone agrees that his contributions outweigh his particular quirk. What are you going to do under such a code of conduct? Remove his access to the project? This sounds ridiculous tbh. On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:06 PM Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > 25.10.2018, 13:01, "NIkolai Marchenko" <enmarantis...@gmail.com>: > >> And btw, we have had a clear majority in favour of adding a CoC at the > Contributor Summit > > > > It seems very wrong to make such decisions at conventions where only a > small part of the contributors can participate. > > Especially for something as big and divisive > > +1 > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
