> On 2 Jul 2018, at 16:49, Lars Knoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 2 Jul 2018, at 13:35, Tor Arne Vestbø <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On 2 Jul 2018, at 12:56, Svenn-Arne Dragly <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> There are also many nice options set in the clang-format config found in Qt >>> Creator's sources[2] which I think are interesting. For instance, >>> "BinPackParameters: false" and "BinPackArguments: false" makes sure you to >>> either put all arguments on one line or give if arguments will have one >>> line each. This might be in the controversial category, but it is nice to >>> enable while developing. It makes clang-format reflow the code consistently >>> just by moving a single argument to a new line and running clang-format >>> afterwards. >> >> I oppose mandating this style, through clang-format or otherwise. > > Having a common style that we start following is worth something. And yes, > everybody will always find some details he won't like. So we won't get > anywhere if everybody wants it exactly his way.
Why not ease into this with the non-controversial style-rules first? Tor Arne _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
