Jean-Michaël, I've heard about qpm but never used it since I'm perfectly fine with my distro package manager :) But I'm ok to publish it there if we decide not to add the project to qtquickcontrols2 repo, thank you for the hint!
2018-04-03 20:42 GMT+03:00 Aleksey Kontsevich <tantr...@ya.ru>: > qpm for Qt is an npm analogue for Node.JS? Cool! > > -- > Best regards, > Aleksey > Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich > > > > 03.04.2018, 15:42, "Jean-Michaël Celerier" <jeanmichael.celer...@gmail.com > >: > > If the controls don't end up in qtquickcontrols2, please at least > consider putting them in qpm (https://www.qpm.io/) so that other people > can benefit from them easily :) > > > > ------- > > Jean-Michaël Celerier > > http://www.jcelerier.name > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Alexey Andreyev < > yetanotherandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Aleksey Kontsevich! Thank you for your support, I do agree that > Sailfish OS is receiving a huge contribution from Russian speaking > developers and focusing on other local markets too. There's also related > AsteroidOS community about smartwatches. They have a demo [1] > >> > >> Talking about popularity: from my point of view, while Microsoft is > providing their Metro unified look for desktop and Intel-based tablets (and > Xbox) for example, looks like they do not have any plans for new mobile > devices (I mean arm-based) to provide. While Sailfish OS is mobile OS with > GSM-stack support for real arm-based systems. [1] Correct me if I'm wrong, > I do not want to mislead anyone. > >> > >> Mitch Curtis, thank you for your feedback sincerely. I do understand > your skepticism about yet another controls in mainline to support. (but I > do not share this personally :) > >> I'm new to qqc2 internals. I've cloned qtquickcontrols2 repo 5.10.1 > brach (to play on my Arch Linux system). Dependency from some private APIs > looks tricky for me at first glance. I'm trying to sort out. I'm not > against providing silica style as some custom repo, the result I want to > get is open source solution to run Qt application in my personal > environment with native Silica look and feel. Will be happy to get any > hints about basic repo draft in that case (should I look at Kirigami > approach?) > >> > >> Anyway, as I wrote at my GSoC proposal, GSoC campaign is just money > support, I love Silica style, using Sailfish OS for several years and can't > stand that no one is willing to port it to modern QQC2 approach :) I guess > it could radically change skepticism about qt quick controls approach in > general from ios and android developers. > >> > >> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd86KTs2Les > >> [2]: https://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Adaptations/libhybris > >> > >> 2018-04-03 13:38 GMT+03:00 Aleksey Kontsevich <tantr...@ya.ru>: > >>> Hi all, my 2 cents here: > >>> > >>>>The controls look nice, but my concern is how relevant the Silica > style is these days (in the context of how many people are developing apps > for the > >>>>Sailfish OS). > >>> > >>> Sailfish OS become VERY popular in Russia and in Latin America, and > for people who wants their data and communication be secure. Market in > Russia growing very fast, Sailfish OS devices are hits of sales, leading > universities created courses for Sailfish OS, government certified > >>> it for corporate and government use and since 2019 all mobile > applications from national software list (government and corporate use) > should work in Sailfish OS (according to import replacing law all > applications should be Russian-native and secure). > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Aleksey > >>> Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich > >>> > >>> 03.04.2018, 13:13, "Mitch Curtis" <mitch.cur...@qt.io>: > >>>> Hi Alexey. > >>>> > >>>> The controls look nice, but my concern is how relevant the Silica > style is these days (in the context of how many people are developing apps > for the Sailfish OS). > >>>> > >>>> For each style we currently have, I would justify their inclusion > into qtquickcontrols2.git for the following reasons: > >>>> > >>>> Default - extremely high performance at the cost of a very basic > appearance. Tries to be neutral in terms of looks. > >>>> > >>>> Fusion - bridges the gap in terms of Desktop styling. An > additional/more specific point that I think it is important here is that > the controls are more compact (smaller) than any other pre-built style we > offer (the Material style has a dense variant now, but that’s still larger > if I recall correctly). > >>>> > >>>> Imagine - puts power in the hands of designers, frees up time for > developers. > >>>> > >>>> Material - very relevant in terms of Android market share. Looks > really nice; a good candidate for “non-native” cross-platform apps. > >>>> > >>>> Universal - relevant in terms of Windows market share. > >>>> > >>>> As mentioned, I do think the Silica controls look nice, but that’s > the only justification I could think of for including them in > qtquickcontrols2.git. For each new style we add, the maintenance cost > increases, so this is something that we need to consider. > >>>> > >>>> What is your opinion on this? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers. > >>>> > >>>> From: Alexey Andreyev [mailto:yetanotherandre...@gmail.com] > >>>> Sent: Friday, 23 March 2018 8:49 PM > >>>> To: Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io> > >>>> Cc: development@qt-project.org > >>>> Subject: Re: [Development] [Google Summer of Code] [Project Ideas] Qt > Quick Controls 2 Sailfish Silica Style > >>>> > >>>> Thank you Mitch for the feedback! > >>>> I've also tried to record current controls on a real device: > https://youtu.be/T-qUZMuTGqw (hope not only 360p will be available soon) > >>>> > >>>> 2018-03-23 21:55 GMT+03:00 Alexey Andreyev < > yetanotherandre...@gmail.com>: > >>>>> Silica cheat sheet: > >>>>> https://sailfishos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ > component_cheatsheet.png > >>>>> Theme cheat sheet: > >>>>> https://sailfishos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/theme_ > cheatsheet.png > >>>>> Icon reference: > >>>>> https://sailfishos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/icon_reference.png > >>>>> code example: > >>>>> https://gist.github.com/jaymzznoori/a980314f8248e0a1e7904c29c88ecdf3 > >>>>> > >>>>> Youtube video with timestamp for platform-specific PulleyMenu > element example: https://youtu.be/jByW7UNmbxU?t=11m38s > >>>>> > >>>>> 2018-03-23 21:40 GMT+03:00 Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io>: > >>>>>> Hello. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are there any screenshots of it? I read that entire page and the > Silica docs but couldn’t see anything. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis= > qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Andreyev > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, 23 March 2018 5:39 PM > >>>>>> To: development@qt-project.org > >>>>>> Subject: [Development] [Google Summer of Code] [Project Ideas] Qt > Quick Controls 2 Sailfish Silica Style > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello! > >>>>>> My name is Alexey, what do you think about Silica Style for QQC2 as > a gsoc project? > >>>>>> I have some notes here: http://aa13q.ru/qqc2-silica-style-en/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and want to create a proposal. > >>>> > >>> , > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Development mailing list > >>> Development@qt-project.org > >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
