On 2016-12-09 19:43, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sexta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2016, às 16:50:29 PST, Matthew Woehlke > escreveu: >> On 2016-12-09 16:23, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> That's a valid concern, but not one that warrants a QApplication subclass. >> >> Right; that one is an issue if the user is no longer in control of >> instantiating the Q*Application instance. > > Ah, that's a good point. > > Though quite frankly I don't see that as an issue. Applications can only have > access to argc and argv if they write the main() function, which means they > can continue to use the current functionality. > > I'm imaginiing that this new way is needed for platforms where a main() > function makes no sense, in which case there's no command-line to begin with.
If we're not deprecating the traditional main(), that WFM. (That's not how I read the initial post, however...) -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
