Em sexta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:28:13 PST, Matthew Woehlke 
escreveu:
> I can work around that, though it's obnoxious. I'm more concerned about
> not being able to tinker with the CLI arguments before Qt gets them.

That's a valid concern, but not one that warrants a QApplication subclass.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to