On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:59:47AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 30 de abril de 2013 17.24.29, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > Can we do it somehow less magically? Isn't there a way to do it if it > > > needs to be done, and not do it if it doesn't need to be done? > > > > no, because latest on the second in-source build it would not be > > necessary any more, thus messing up the expectations of those who want a > > rebuild. > > I'm seriously wondering why configure.exe needs to be rebuilt if none of the > sources have changed. Can't we simply adapt the Makefile? > that would mean shipping a complete build dir including object files. also, the semantics get really funky for shadows builds (read-only source dir).
> For the include dir, it's a little harder to determine, especially since this > will also affect rules inside .prf files in mkspecs. Any chance we can simply > try and run syncqt, but ignore errors? > talking about "less magically", huh? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
