On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:44:18AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 29 de abril de 2013 11.06.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > my current solution is entirely predictable: git builds always run
> > syncqt, while other builds never do. this makes a very clear statement:
> > if you want to modify qt (or at least its apis), use git.
> 
> Please note that this is not the proposal.
> 
> The proposal was to have the big packages include the headers, but the split 
> source packages not have them.
> 
which makes no sense as far as i'm concerned.
i'll rethink my stance if you answer my questions regarding the
verification process to my satisfaction.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to