On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote: >> The float version is a simplified duplicate of QVector3D. Is this really the >> right way to go? > > You should really consider in QtGui to use 3D point base in the > future, and extend that with your math wishes.
Not to mention, it is the same duplicated situation with QPointF and QVector2D already, almost in the same sense. I can just encourage the collaboration more again. Build only your layer on top of what QtCore already provides, so establish what it does not provide. >> And how useful is really the integer version? There is almost no 3D math >> that works with integer only arithmetics. > > If there is a point representing 2d with integers, I do not see the > problem with having the analogy for 3D. Please note that, tracking > coordinates itself has nothing to do with math. It can be used outside > that area as well. I mean, you do not always need a hefty math library for simple things. I personally believe that the point classes make sense in QtCore. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
