On 11 June 2012 09:21, João Abecasis <joao.abeca...@nokia.com> wrote: > Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> On 11 June 2012 00:49, <tasuku.suz...@nokia.com> wrote: >>> Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it >>> to feature list and fix the build. >> >> To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into >> samething like QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for selectively disabling >> PCRE+QRegularExpression (butkeeping QRegExp)? > > I'm not sure we should allow QRegExp to be used when there is no > QRegularExpression, as we want code to move over to using QRegularExpression, > not the other way around.
Sure -- I was purely talking in terms of "individual features" to compile in: QRegExp and QRegularExpression are independent and therefore could be individually disabled... Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
