Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 11 June 2012 00:49, <tasuku.suz...@nokia.com> wrote: >> Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it >> to feature list and fix the build. > > To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into > samething like QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for selectively disabling > PCRE+QRegularExpression (butkeeping QRegExp)?
I'm not sure we should allow QRegExp to be used when there is no QRegularExpression, as we want code to move over to using QRegularExpression, not the other way around. Cheers, João _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
