Hi, On 25.05.2012 09:34, André Somers wrote: > Bottom line: let's not introduce rules that are supposed to solve > problems that have not occured, and that are likely to cause more > problems than they might ever prevent occuring in the first place. I > would like to stimulate people to make the most of the current set of > rules: if you have a doubt about an approver nomination, just voice it.
I also don't think fixed numbers in rules are very wise. What about offering some moving average stats of various metrics somewhere (maybe they already exist?) and just referring to them in the rules as a guide line? That's more dynamic and adapts to the different activity levels over modules and time. BR, Sven _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
