Op 25-5-2012 11:53, Sylvain Pointeau schreef:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I think that defining fixed number of LOC or hours spend on
> the project is not going to work. Please don't go there.
I fully agree. I can understand the other Andre's point as well, but I
think those are really not too helpful measurements to introduce
unfortunately.
Why not using the priority of (number of) bugs solved?
No, the question should be the other way around: why use that? How is
that a measure for how fit a person is to take the role of Approver? Do
you have any data that supports the notion that someone fixing a number
of high priority bugs is a more qualified person to fill the role of
Approver than somebody else who has done significant contributions to
the project?
Please don't just suggest _other_ random measures one might use, but
first considder what such a measure actually measures, and if that
really is related to the question at hand: does a person most likely
make a good Approver?
André
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
