On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 11.49.40, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > and just for good measure, let simo repeat "i will not bypass CI again" > > about a thousand times. > > Why? It sounds like this is exactly the proper releasing procedure. It's > been like that since forever.
Clarifying: the procedure we've used is that the patch is properly approved
into the codeline, then cherry-picked into the release branch.
I don't want Simo to bypass the approval flow or CI. But having a release
branch might be necessary. That might be one of the regular branches we work
on, which is deep-frozen for a release. The workflow for this isn't established
yet.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
