On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 16.38.41, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:54:56AM -0300, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 13.49.40, [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > Those were local in Simo's machine due to some cherry-picking of not yet > > > landed changed. I wanted to tag with reviewed an landed changes though > > > > Please upload the exact SHA-1 from Simo's machine because those are in the > > released package now. > > > > I recommend the procedure: > > > > per-module: > > 1) git tag -a the *exact* SHA-1 that are found on Simo's machine > > > > if the module does not follow Qt's versioning, tag it as > > "qt-v5.0.0-alpha1" > > retroactively setting the date too with GIT_COMMITTER_DATE > > > > 2) wait for the fixes to land > > 3) git merge -s ours v5.0.0-alpha1 > > 4) push the merge, approve it, stage it > > or just admit the screwup, and silently upload a tar-ball with the > corrected sha1s, for the sake of not uglifying the git history.
If you can land all the patches into Gerrit without any other patch in-
between, sure.
I'll buy anyone who can do that for all modules all their beers in Berlin.
> and just for good measure, let simo repeat "i will not bypass CI again"
> about a thousand times.
Why? It sounds like this is exactly the proper releasing procedure. It's been
like that since forever.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
