This patch looks good.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:43 AM <aaron.nyh...@unfoldedeffective.com> wrote:
> From: Aaron Nyholm <aaron.nyh...@southerninnovation.com>
>
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c
> index ca2454b33c..dc73d3f9db 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int flashdev_shell_read(
> }
>
> /* Print buffer out in 32bit blocks */
> - printf("Reading %s at 0x%08x for %d bytes\n", dev_path, address, bytes);
> + printf("Reading %s at 0x%08x for 0x%x bytes\n", dev_path, address,
> bytes);
> for (int i = 0; i < (bytes/4); i++) {
> printf("%08x ", ((uint32_t*)buffer)[i]);
> if ((i+1)%4 == 0) {
> @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ int flashdev_shell_write(
> return -1;
> }
>
> + printf(
> + "Writing %s to %s at 0x%08x for 0x%jx bytes\n",
> + file_path,
> + dev_path,
> + address,
> + length
> + );
> /* Create buffer */
> buffer = calloc(1, 0x1000);
>
> @@ -358,7 +365,7 @@ int flashdev_shell_erase(
> return -1;
> }
>
> - printf("Erasing at %08x for %x bytes\n", address, bytes);
> + printf("Erasing at 0x%08x for 0x%x bytes\n", address, bytes);
>
> /* Erase flash */
> args.offset = address;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
