From: hongnanli <hongnan...@linux.alibaba.com>
inode->i_mutex has been replaced with inode->i_rwsem long ago. Fix
comments still mentioning i_mutex.
Signed-off-by: hongnanli <hongnan...@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
---
cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/jffs2_fs_i.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/jffs2_fs_i.h
b/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/jffs2_fs_i.h
index 6b6050e9eb..64ff8abc01 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/jffs2_fs_i.h
+++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/jffs2_fs_i.h
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
struct jffs2_inode_info {
- /* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_mutex.
+ /* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_rwsem.
Unfortunately, we can't used the existing one, because
either the GC would deadlock, or we'd have to release it
before letting GC proceed. Or we'd have to put ugliness
- into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_mutex
+ into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_rwsem
for the inode(s) which are already locked */
struct mutex sem;
--
2.35.3
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
