Thank you for the clarification. I knew we discussed this recently and
didn't recall the outcome. This is fine, we can be nicer than (say)
compiler writers :)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:21 PM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2021 20:14, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >> + memset( attributes, 0, sizeof( *attributes ) );
> >> +
> >> + if ( !bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector( vector ) ) {
> >> + return RTEMS_INVALID_ID;
> >> + }
> > I think do the error checking first, before changing the out parameters?
>
> Some users ignore return values. This way they get at least a
> deterministic result from the directive. See:
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-March/065840.html
>
>
> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
