On 15/6/21 4:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/06/2021 08:46, Chris Johns wrote: >> If this is pushed through and the task it left for the "demand" queue it is >> actually being placed on my queue because I am the one releasing RTEMS and I >> think having these sorts of things resolved at release time is not great >> because >> there is never enough testing. > > I don't think this would have happened.
Thanks and I hope it does not. > I usually fix things which I broke (in > this case the removal of the old build system). I just don't like it to waste > my > time on things which have no future and this is definitely the old build > system. I also see no future holding onto the old build system and agree it is a waste of time. I am not blocking the progress just bringing into focus what we have to sort to out and what happens when it is not done. Also I do not have a workable solution for building a kernel with the RSB and I would love to have the time to work on one. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
