my waf file look like this $cat config.ini [sparc/leon3] BUILD_TESTS=True
for rebuilding the bsp I ran: ./waf configure ./waf Zack Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, March 30, 2021 9:02 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:41 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel > zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > I have both of the options and i tried to built it with BUILD_TESTS and > > PSXTESTS and the test didn't build. Is there anything else that could alter > > how rtems is built? > > After you set them to True, did you re-run waf configure before waf build? > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, March 30, 2021 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote: > > > > > BUILD_TESTS and BUILD_PSXTESTS are two options that > > > if either is True it should build psxclock02. > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:20 AM zack_on_the_speed_chanel > > > zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > > > > > I did build the leon3 bsp and I still don't see the psxtimer02 as an > > > > executable. Is there a way build a test from source? I have the sources > > > > for psxtest02. Also i'm thinking that it could be due to the fact that > > > > i don't have posix tests enabled. Is there a way > > > > that to enable posix? > > > > Thanks > > > > Zack > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > > On Monday, March 29, 2021 8:11 PM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel > > > > zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry that assumption was very native of me that i didn't have a > > > > > working baseline. Joel said that the erc32 was similar to the leon bsp > > > > > " > > > > > The ERC32 what's the first space hardened sparc processor. The leon3 > > > > > is a > > > > > later processor in the same family. Both use the same build of GCC > > > > > and are > > > > > just different bsps. In fact both run on the same sis simulator. " > > > > > I also though that the bsps were the same and I can work on the issue > > > > > with only the erc32 BSP. I have one more question: when i run the > > > > > hello world test. All the test files are within one specific > > > > > directory and I don't see the executables for specific bsps that's > > > > > why i thought all tests would be built (there would not be any > > > > > specific considerations for bsps) . > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > > > On Monday, March 29, 2021 2:45 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 1:26 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel > > > > > > zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > I'm updating on what' i've found out with the issue (forgot to > > > > > > > reply all) . Joel recommended me check the coverage for the leon > > > > > > > BSP( to check if it's supported) and i found that the branch with > > > > > > > CLOCK_MONOTONIC was not reached I think now that it's supported > > > > > > > (because the annotated assembly is in the sparc instruction set). > > > > > > > I also found out that the test would be similar to Psxclock02 and > > > > > > > it runs the same tests on a different clock. Then I tried to > > > > > > > build the psxclock02 test , change the create_clock to have the > > > > > > > clock_monotonic argument and i didn't see the executable or any > > > > > > > change in the ./waf build. Then I was suggested that you have to > > > > > > > enable all tests some how? How do i enable all tests? > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you use something like: ./waf bsp_defaults ---rtems-bsp=leon3 > > > > > > > config.ini > > > > > > Then, take a look, BUILD_TESTS and BUILD_PSXTESTS are two options > > > > > > that > > > > > > if either is True it should build psxclock02. > > > > > > When you write code, you should first make sure you can build the > > > > > > code > > > > > > as it exists if it is supposed to work, and run it to see that it > > > > > > works. Then you should make changes from a working baseline. > > > > > > Otherwise > > > > > > when you get a problem, how do you know if the problem is your > > > > > > problem, or it already existed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Zack > > > > > > > devel mailing list > > > > > > > devel@rtems.org > > > > > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel