This is now supposed to be fixed on the gdb master. Does the RSB need to be moved forward?
--joel On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:32 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 5:04 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On 21/1/21 3:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:20 PM Sebastian Huber >> > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto: >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 17/01/2021 21:23, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > > Does this fix the build failure for what looks to be all 6 >> toolchains >> > > over the weekend? >> > >> > No, there seems to be a CentOS 7.9 specific issue with the GDB >> build: >> > >> > >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-January/175152.html >> > < >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-January/175152.html> >> > >> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27219 >> > <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27219> >> > >> > I attached a patch to that. >> >> Will there be a patch for the RSB to apply the patch? >> > > The RSB for 6 is using the gdb head. This just needs to be merged. > >> >> Chris >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
