On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 6:58 PM Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> wrote:
> *From:* Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> > *Sent:* Friday, January 15, 2021 18:18 > *To:* Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> > *Cc:* Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org>; Development <devel@rtems.org> > *Subject:* Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to > secondary UART > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 6:09 PM Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> > wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> > Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 17:10 > To: Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>; Development <devel@rtems.org> > Subject: Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to > secondary UART > > > On 16/1/21 1:46 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > >> This change only applies to the aarch64 variants since they're brand > new and I didn't want to disturb existing users of the ARM/Xilinx-Zynq and > ARM/Xilinx-ZynqMP BSPs. > > > > Sure. I am wondering if the change works on FreeBSD because my testing > on other > > BSPs showed it does not work. I am wondering if this change works on > FreeBSD for > > the aarch64 qemu? > > My testing thus far on Qemu with the AArch64 BSP shows normal output on > the primary UART instead of the secondary UART for both RTEMS' internal > testsuite as well as the LibBSD tests. I did rebuilds from scratch earlier > today for some other changes and verified that the Qemu output was good. > I've got them running in CI as well, but that only covers the RTEMS tests. > > > > Chris was asking about the qemu version and if the command works on > FreeBSD hosts. > > > > Whoops, I was reading what my eyes wanted to see (LibBSD everywhere). I > haven’t done any testing on FreeBSD hosts, but I would expect that qemu > operates the same across platforms since it’s the same codebase. > Are you using the RSB qemu or the Debian package? > > > Kinsey >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
