From: Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 18:18 To: Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> Cc: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org>; Development <devel@rtems.org> Subject: Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to secondary UART
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 6:09 PM Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com<mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>> wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org<mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 17:10 To: Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com<mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>>; Development <devel@rtems.org<mailto:devel@rtems.org>> Subject: Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to secondary UART > On 16/1/21 1:46 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: >> This change only applies to the aarch64 variants since they're brand new and >> I didn't want to disturb existing users of the ARM/Xilinx-Zynq and >> ARM/Xilinx-ZynqMP BSPs. > > Sure. I am wondering if the change works on FreeBSD because my testing on > other > BSPs showed it does not work. I am wondering if this change works on FreeBSD > for > the aarch64 qemu? My testing thus far on Qemu with the AArch64 BSP shows normal output on the primary UART instead of the secondary UART for both RTEMS' internal testsuite as well as the LibBSD tests. I did rebuilds from scratch earlier today for some other changes and verified that the Qemu output was good. I've got them running in CI as well, but that only covers the RTEMS tests. Chris was asking about the qemu version and if the command works on FreeBSD hosts. Whoops, I was reading what my eyes wanted to see (LibBSD everywhere). I haven’t done any testing on FreeBSD hosts, but I would expect that qemu operates the same across platforms since it’s the same codebase. Kinsey
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
