On 2/12/20 3:29 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke > with the > > qemu version bump in the RSB. > > I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input. > > Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > <https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/> work?
Yes it would and it is small enough to be included. > It could be an interesting > project to get even one input-related test running under automation. It would be and this failure highlights a weakness in the rtems-test command. I would need to see where in the runtime I would place input processing and if the input side would need an extra thread. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
