On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 10:30 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >>> On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke >>> with the >>> > qemu version bump in the RSB. >>> >>> I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input. >>> >>> Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ work? It >> could be an interesting project to get even one input-related test running >> under automation. >> > > This might be a good GSoC project. Hard part might be associating test > scripts with executables. > > What if we want more than one? Seems likely if the shell is going to be > exercised thoroughly. >
Induction. :) > >> >>> Chris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@rtems.org >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
